Dan: 01-Mar-2011 12:13:52
I have been going back and editing. I have written a lot. Except for clarity's sake, I am not changing anything. The evidence, arguments, and conclusions have not changed. One thing is for sure, all we have for now is my plan of action. A keyhole we can pass through only with public, willing, conscious, cooperation by our politicians and other leaders. Right now, except for confirming reports that further my conclusions, I can see nothing to change in my plan except say this better so you will act. Our chances are fifty/fifty, the plan works or we all die. A lot better than the zero chance of not trying.

Dan: 26-Feb-2011 21:06:24
Beyond fleshing out the mathematical mechanics of navigation at FTL, the two fundamental requirements of a interplanetary faster than light(FTL) spaceship are 1) measuring your speed as a percentage of the speed of light = c; and 2) controlling the frequencies around your spaceship that represents your % of c speed and your location on our Moebius universe surface. The basic geometry of this ship's form will kill both birds with one stone.

Dan: 25-Feb-2011 11:10:06
Time is running out. I have been going over the technical requirements of building an interplanetary FTL ship in time. There is still time, but unless we put a lot of smart want to do it people together by July, I think the odds get much longer against us.

Dan: 19-Feb-2011 13:10:08
I know what to ask for now and why the E-Ts will not not help us do a disconnection. I never do anything until the last second. Life lives by death. The question as always, who and when?

Dan: 19-Feb-2011 02:57:50
The question "Should we?" is deadly serious. I don't nor do others have to respect the majority who I think will choose to let us die without a try. It is no accident that there are so many of us Homo Saps on Earth right now. I think many of us are suicide wishers who think unconsciously that being vaporized will get them out of immortal consciousness. My bet is on . Close but no cigar. Think well on your poll choice, I am indifferent to which choice should prevail. Look up what "indifferent" means to an economist.

Dan: 14-Feb-2011 11:36:38
A fascinating error. In my question I put the A-M debt arrival date as July 16, 2009 instead of July 16, 2012. No wonder no one questioned me. You had to go into one of the articles to see the discrepancy. I must have read over the 2009 a hundred times. Now that I can explain the4 equation, I actually need response. I was not ready until now. So much for being in control.

Dan: 12-Feb-2011 20:34:56
ToDo contract URL and Why either way is a win/win for us. Why because both alternatives are something new, Self awareness is impossible to get out of without doing it whole hog first. Clearly this is a seed pod bursting event we are trying to stop. That would me4an more life forms become possible in the fullness of time. On th eother hand, we allow our base sub-universe to split in two, both doubling in size and we would rise individually and as a civilization to to a higher level of consciousness. A society consciously based upon no first cost.

Dan: 09-Feb-2011 12:14:30
About our civilization. We don't in the main really work at practicing no first cost to each other, do we? At least it seems our leaderships don't. They do like to cheat. Our problem is that we tolerate them doing so, the worst first cost of all.

Dan: 05-Feb-2011 12:56:37
A clue on Edge relationships. As presently mathematically described, A Moebius has only one edge that maintains a predictable straight line angle between opposite edge sides. Of course with two sides and a real required Edge Width(EW), there are actually 4 edges and 2 opposites and two katy corner opposite vertices between the edges. Here is the 1-31-11 MT that gave the clue. "How you denote time in the NOW is the key. It has to have two(lovely discrepancy 2-4-11) edges, two sides to it. It has a past and future and one always leads to the other. So that requires w respect to what zero, origin, the center. A Moebius bends back upon itself, seeks to split itself.".

Dan: 04-Feb-2011 14:07:10
Some good news on Gulf Oil Spill. The January 21 Science in "A Persistent Oxygen Anomaly Reveals the Fate of Spilled Methane in the Deep Gulf of Mexico" says methane eating bacteria have eaten all the CH4 and that basically none of the BP well methane reached surface. Measurements indicate extremely rapid growth of methane eating bacteria when given a food stock. It would take a massive breakout for it to reach surface. God help us should we smell methane on Gulf surface this coming April-May.

Dan: 01-Feb-2011 07:06:31
Walras Law is a crucial form for eq. The numeraire, the nth commodity is time alive spent on any XC. I will work on that first.

Dan: 01-Feb-2011 07:03:04
How you denote time in the NOW is the key. It has to have two(lovely discrepancy 2-4-11) edges, two sides to it. It has a past and future and one always leads to the other. So that requires w respect to what zero, origin, the center. A Moebius bends back upon itself, seeks to split itself.

Dan: 31-Jan-2011 01:51:37
Arguing from a base premise like h/2PiR to show why FTL is possible is in some ways harder than going down through FTL to discovering the premise. That is a matter of clear explanation for me. Hits are up, hits on articles are up, but January has been a heavy month for past few years. Still not a question or comment.

Dan: 29-Jan-2011 12:33:05
Started paper, my son said maybe E-Ts will do the disconnection for us and just not tell us. Answer, then why warn us?

Dan: 24-Jan-2011 11:40:15
Time to write an abstract of Why & How We Can Go FTL.

Dan: 20-Jan-2011 23:41:55
Should we stop Our Anti-Matter(A-M conservation debt from striking the Sun on July 16, 2012 vaporizing Earth? Our first public N1CL question. I am not going to make this decision alone.

Dan: 15-Jan-2011 11:46:05
Don't do anything until the contract is signed. By who? Only full members of N1CL count. Todo: I will sum up by setting contract terms for my further help in this matter.

Dan: 15-Jan-2011 03:51:36
Equation: I keep going back over it and all I do is keep reinforcing it. Put it to the test with Professor Lee at UW. We will see.

Dan: 09-Jan-2011 12:35:09
I have a prediction pair that demonstrates that a conserved geometry universe like a Moebius geometry one must have two origins tied together by a common ratio, h-bar. You can see it for yourself. I need to get this prediction/demonstration confirmed next week. My last chance to be wrong.

Dan: 07-Jan-2011 14:08:59
After more thought on mechanics of building an interplanetary FTL spaceship, that is much simpler than a true FTL starship; mainly because of power requirements and duration in space. What we do need is strong and for interplanetary hops, weight is much less of a consideration so we can build for strength with fairly cheap off the shelf materials. The Repulsive Force can do much of the work.

Dan: 04-Jan-2011 12:09:17
Now that I have the base framework of the FTL navigation equation, I am as always confronted with the question, "How much do I show the rest of you, while insuring that doing FTL is not blocked by our governments or other not so nice people?" Since this equation is essentially a description of how a Moebius describes itself with respect to itself, it takes someone wanting to know how self-awareness is objectively created. Hmm! As always you have to ask, would our government leaders use the technology to save a few or to save Earth? Most people give the same answer, our political leaders are not to be trusted. I think that once they actually look at the evidence, they will do what must be done. Which is to join in with everyone else who wants to do FTL within the next 18 months. Done by signing a contract paying me $$$ in this way coupled with complete access and control over any people or materials required to build two or more working FTL ships of which one will be dropped down a wormhole to our A-M debt on July 16, 2009. I get to keep the first four incl delivering #1 to blow up A-M conservation debt, the remaining three will be used to explore and go where I direct off Earth, After that I get 10% royalties on all gross revenues from patents. I will only negotiate with members of the No 1st Cost List. I suspect there are many private parties who prefer to keep Earth alive and also themselves.

Dan: 01-Jan-2011 23:22:41
Once you can locate yourself on the surface of a Moebius with respect to its only possible origin, then you can do Faster than Light. FTL does have constraints, you do not get to go behind yourself in time, nor into the future, but all areas outside of your own light cone are possible. Just need a ship, navigation, power, and knowing what vibrations to change. The rest is implied detail. The two biggest details are getting the right people interested and enough money to do this in time for disconnection.

Dan: 01-Jan-2011 23:16:42
Equation, we have a navigation eq: Once the base conservation form of eq. is defined with respect to c, the speed of light; then one can deduce the two possible physical ways paired matter/anti- matter frames of reference can meet. Since being directly opposite one another on the two sides of a M surface are prevented by the straight line Repulsive Force, that only leaves the other possiblility. Which is when the two Frames are 180 degrees apart from there starting point. In Earth's case, that would be when the first sexual Eucaryote cell was created ablut 2 plus billion years ago. By defining where these two points are with respect to a M origin, then we can dedeuce how to measure how the angle of our point location on surface is with respect to origin of M as no two M surface points can share same angle.

Dan: 29-Dec-2010 10:22:11
Added confirmation to my topic, "Why BP well still has a growing leak! 12-26-10 confirmation" .

Dan: 28-Dec-2010 11:27:36
Yet increasing materials cost can only do two things - it can show up in final prices (price inflation) or it can be absorbed (margin destruction.) Those are the only two possibilities.